Legal Opinion

Quackenbush v. Leonard

New York Court of Chancery

Decided February 21, 1843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was an application on the part of the complainants to make B. Slade, who had married one of the female complainants, a party to the suit; also to make G. Webster a party defendant, by a supplemental bill; and to set aside certain proceedings, on the part of the defendants, before a master, which had taken place during the pendency of an appeal to the court for the correction of errors.

Read the full summary

This was an application on the part of the complainants to make B. Slade, who had married one of the female complainants, a party to the suit; also to make G. Webster a party defendant, by a supplemental bill; and to set aside certain proceedings, on the part of the defendants, before a master, which had taken place during the pendency of an appeal to the court for the correction of errors. The complainants in their petition also asked for a modification of the decree which had been made by this court, and affirmed by the court for the correction of errors on appeal, in relation to the…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The marriage of one of the female complainants, although after the decree in this cause, was an abatement of the suit; and it must be revived, either in favor of or against the husband, before any further proceedings can be had in the suit, except to set aside the irregular proceedings which have been had in the master’s office in the mean time. But the decree of the court for the correction of errors, affirming the decree of this court, although made after the marriage of one of the complainants, was not void; and it must be carried into effect here after the proper parties…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cary v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Perkins v. Sierra Nevada Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Standard Elevator Co. v. Crane Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  4. Steinback v. DiepenbrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Curtis v. LeavittNew York Supreme Court · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API