Corey v. Long
The Superior Court of New York City
Hearing upon exceptions to referee’s report. F. N. Bangs, for the assignee in bankruptcy ; That the receiver’s taking possession was a legal process, cited 7 Blatchf., 262; Re Binninger & Clark, 6 N. B. R., 43; Re Merchants’ Ins. Co., Platt v. Archer, MSS.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This cause was brought on and submitted upon the pleadings and all proceedings and orders heretofore had and made therein, for the final determination of such questions as remain undecided. From the papers thus submitted, it appears that, prior to December 7, 1869, Albert B. Corey and Walter P. Long were partners, under the firm name of Walter P. Long & Co. On December 7, 1869, Corey sold to Long his (Corey’s) interest in the partnership property and effects, and Long agreed to pay the existing debts of the partnership. On January 13, 1870, Corey commenced his action in this court for the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Verplanck v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Noe v. GibsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Curtis v. LeavittNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farwell v. Great Western Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Kent v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Grays Harbor Commercial Co. v. FiferWashington Supreme Court · 1917