State v. Damien A. Candland
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
Justice DURHAM,
opinion of the Court:
T 1 Mr. Candland pled guilty to aggravated murder and now appeals his conviction and sentence. We hold that Mr. Candland received constitutionally adequate notice of the nature of the charge and of his limited appeal rights. We also hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Mr. Candland entered his plea knowingly and voluntarily. We therefore affirm his conviction and sentence.
BACKGROUND
€ 2 Mr. Candland pled guilty to aggravated murder and aggravated assault based on two unrelated incidents. His plea affidavit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. TrotterUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. TingeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Arriaga v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- State v. GrazianoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.