Feustmann v. Estate of Gott
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw. (Joslin, J.) Claim filed against estate of deceased person. Allowed in probate and circuit courts, and judgment affirmed on error brought by the administrator. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
In the month of April, 1881, Mrs. A. M. Crane resided in Ann Arbor, and was engaged in the millinery business. She had negotiations with Feustmann & Raufmann, of Philadelphia, a firm in that city, engaged in trade in that kind of business, for the purchase of a bill of millinery goods to the amount of $300 on four months’ time. Feustmann & Raufmann, however, declined her order, unless she secured the payment therefor, and for that purpose she obtained and forwarded to the Philadelphia firm the following letter of James B. Gott, viz.:
“ Ann Arbor, April 29, 1881. “Messrs. Feustmann & Rauemann,—
“…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Wilkins v. EllettSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Doolittle v. LewisNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
- In re Mower's appealMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Reynolds v. McMullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Groendyke v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Schmid & Smith v. ShawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Chandler Lumber Co. v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908