Legal Opinion

Schmid & Smith v. Shaw

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1924No. 11,740PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Action by appellee against appellants to recover certain rents alleged to have been collected by appellants for appellee on real estate located in the city of Indianapolis.

There was a trial by the court, with special findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of appellee, upon which judgmént was rendered for $2,551.65 in appellee’s favor. From this judgment, after motion for a new trial was overruled, this appeal is prosecuted.

The errors assigned are the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial and in stating conclusions of law in favor of appellee.

It appears…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parsons v. . LymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. In re the Estate of OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Putnam v. PitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Caspary v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Earl v. DresserIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Final Accounting of Hanover BankNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Martin v. Hancock Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Volpe v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API