Legal Opinion

Groendyke v. Musgrave

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 11, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. W. H. McHenry', Judge. Action at law upon a contract of guaranty. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals*

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In May, 1901, the Economy Manufacturing’ & Supply Company was a corporation in the city of Des Moines doing business as a dealer in agricultural implements and binding twine. At the same time the plaintiff herein was a wholesale dealer in similar goods at Chicago, 111. The jdaintiff’s traveling representative, under date of May 6, 1901, obtained a written order from said corporation for a quantity of binding twine, described as “25,000 lbs. si-sal at 7% c. per lb, and 25,000 lbs. Standard at 7% c- per lb.” As originally written, the order provided ' that a note for the amount of the purchase,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. HillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Evans v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Garrick v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Kennedy v. Citizens' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Ward v. HollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stutsman v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Pilkington v. PotwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. In re Estate of ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Cullum v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API