Legal Opinion

Pomtree v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 2003No. 02-1302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

We take jurisdiction of this appeal, because it involves this court’s power to regulate the practice of law. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(a) (5). Specifically, appellant Nealon Pomtree questions the trial court’s imposition of Rule 11 sanctions for his having filed suit in Pulaski County Circuit Court against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm); the Pulaski County Circuit Court found that Pomtree improperly attempted to collaterally attack an attorney’s lien issue which was already pending in the Cleburne County Circuit Court. That pending suit in Cleburne…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Arkansas Council on Economic EducationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Chavers v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Bratton v. GunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parker v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Warr v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Reeve v. Carroll CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Sanford v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. City of Little Rock v. NerhanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API