Legal Opinion

Reeve v. Carroll County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 2008No. 07-1239PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul E. Danielson, Justice.

This case began as an illegal-exaction suit filed by appellants John Reeve et al. and ended

in Rule 11 sanctions granted against counsel for appellants, Cindy M. Baker. Appellants argue on appeal that the circuit court’s order issued on May 17, 2007, was not a final order, or, alternatively, that it should have been set aside. Furthermore, Baker contends that the circuit court abused its discretion in finding she violated Rule 11 and by awarding attorney’s fees. We affirm the circuit court.

Appellants filed their illegal-exaction claim on October 31, 2006. Appellees,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pomtree v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Sanford v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Shivey v. ShiveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Bancorpsouth Bank v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Centennial Bank v. Tribuilt Construction Group, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Stay Strong, Status Quo, a Local Option Ballot Question Committee, and Bevans Family Limited Partnership v. Pam Bradford in Her Official Capacity as County Clerk of Van Buren County, ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API