Carolina-Tennessee Power Co. v. Hiawassee River Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN, tried before Adams, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1917, of Cheeokee. The case was before us at a former term, and for any facts not herein stated, reference may be had to the report of the case, 171 N. C., 248. The following summary of the facts so far as necessary to be stated at present will show the contentions of the parties in a general way: This action was brought in the Superior Court of Cherokee County by the plaintiff against the defendant, both of which…
Read the full summary
ActioN, tried before Adams, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1917, of Cheeokee. The case was before us at a former term, and for any facts not herein stated, reference may be had to the report of the case, 171 N. C., 248. The following summary of the facts so far as necessary to be stated at present will show the contentions of the parties in a general way: This action was brought in the Superior Court of Cherokee County by the plaintiff against the defendant, both of which are North Carolina corporations, on 21 August, 1914. Plaintiff alleged that it was a corporation organized under the laws…
1Opinion of the Court
"Walker, J.,
after stating the case: The plaintiff says that upon a fair analysis and consideration of the verdict there is little if anything left after the decision in the former appeal for the defendant’s present contentions to rest upon, and for these reasons, as stated in its brief:
First, it was found in the first issue, by consent, that plaintiff’s locations for its dams, reservoir, and public works had been surveyed in the year 1909, as alleged in the complaint, and the plaintiff had alleged in its complaint that in the year 1909 that officers, engineers and representatives of the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Blacknall v. . HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.