Legal Opinion

Colorado General Assembly v. Lamm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 26, 1985No. 84SA79PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

This case requires us to determine the constitutional validity of the governor’s vetoes of certain provisions in the general appropriation bill for fiscal year 1982 and in a supplemental appropriation bill for fiscal year 1981. We also are presented with the question of the constitutionality of the portions of the bills purportedly vetoed. The district court determined that the vetoes, which deleted legislative specifications of the revenue sources from which funding for certain appropriations was to be derived, did not relate to entire “items” and so were not within the scope…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Jessen Associates, Inc. v. BullockTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API