Legal Opinion

Town of Smithfield v. Fanning

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 7, 1992No. 90-08-APublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This case comes before us on an appeal by the town of Smithfield (town) and also by a proposed intervenor, Washington Highway Development, Inc. (Washington), from a judgment entered in the Superior Court denying the prayers of a complaint for injunctive relief filed by the town against Daniel P. Fanning, director of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (director). 1 We affirm. The facts and travel of the case insofar as pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

According to the findings of the trial justice, the director made plans to construct a storage…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Ludwig v. KowalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Lawrence v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. R. I. Turnpike & Bridge Authority v. CohenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  5. Blackstone Park Improvement Ass'n v. State Board of Standards & AppealsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Town of Richmond v. Wawaloam Reservation, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Town of Rhine v. BizzellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hines Road, LLC v. Neil Hall, in his capacity as Building Inspector for the Town of CumberlandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  4. Renewable Resources, Inc. v. Town of WesterlySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  5. Ruzzo v. LaRose EnterprisesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API