Legal Opinion
Fedell v. Wierzbieniec
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph D. Mintz, J.
Defendant moves for dismissal of plaintiff’s first and second causes of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) or, alternatively, for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b). Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment on her first cause of action and also moves to amend her complaint with respect to the second cause of action increasing the ad damnum clause from $50,000 to $500,000.
The facts underlying this action are as follows: Plaintiff herein was the plaintiff in a personal injury action against Symphony North Apartments for an alleged slip and fall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- MacDonald v. ClingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Anker v. BrodnitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Clark v. GeraciNew York Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Tighe v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Iseman v. Delmar Medical-Dental Building, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Haddad v. GopalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Madden v. Creative Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.