Legal Opinion

Anker v. Brodnitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1979PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Seymour Boyers, J.

Defendants move to reargue and renew a decision of this court dated June 20, 1978 requiring them to inform plaintiff *149of the names of any nonparty treating physicians interviewed by defendants before the receipt of any authorizations and to turn over a copy of the transcripts of such interviews. Defendant Blaugrund also moves for a stay of further discovery until the determination of this motion and the appeal from the prior order.

Defendants’ motion for leave to reargue and renew is granted, and, upon reargument and renewal, the decision of this court is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  3. Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. People v. Al-KananiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Trans-World Investments v. DrobnyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Crist v. MoffattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Stempler v. SpeidellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Roosevelt Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. SweeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API