Legal Opinion

Berg v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 2010PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider whether an appellant’s failure to personally serve on a trial judge a court-ordered statement of errors complained of on appeal, in accordance with Pa.R.A.P. 1925, results in waiver of all issues, where the court’s order itself does not comply with Rule 1925.1 For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand this case for further proceedings.

The relevant procedural history is as follows: In 1998, Appellants, Daniel and Sheryl Berg, filed an action against their automobile insurer, Nationwide…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Greater Erie Industrial Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Berg v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In re Estate of BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API