Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Board of Selectmen of Tisbury

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 2, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

At its 1973 annual town meeting, the town of Tisbury (town) adopted a by-law which purported to bar any selectman elected after December 31, 1973, from holding any other elective town office. The by-law, which is set forth in full in the margin, 1 provides that, if any such selectman holds another elective town office, that other office shall become vacant on his becoming a selectman. In 1973, one of the three defendant selectmen, Manuel M. Maciel, was elected to a three-year term as a water commissioner. He stood successfully for election to the board of selectmen in 1974. The plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Lane v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Rugg v. Town Clerk of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Neils v. City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boston Licensing Board v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Osetek v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Town Council v. Town ManagerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Hayden v. SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  5. Mullen v. Town of MiltonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API