Harrington v. Board of Selectmen of Tisbury
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
At its 1973 annual town meeting, the town of Tisbury (town) adopted a by-law which purported to bar any selectman elected after December 31, 1973, from holding any other elective town office. The by-law, which is set forth in full in the margin, 1 provides that, if any such selectman holds another elective town office, that other office shall become vacant on his becoming a selectman. In 1973, one of the three defendant selectmen, Manuel M. Maciel, was elected to a three-year term as a water commissioner. He stood successfully for election to the board of selectmen in 1974. The plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Lane v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Rugg v. Town Clerk of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Neils v. City of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boston Licensing Board v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Osetek v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Town Council v. Town ManagerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Hayden v. SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Mullen v. Town of MiltonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1982