Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Springfield

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 11, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was submitted to the Superior Court upon a statement of agreed facts and treated as a case stated.

Prior to 1920, the town of West Springfield (town) accepted the provisions of a special act of the Legislature, St. 1893, c. 206, § 10, establishing a board of water commissioners in the town and providing, among other things, for their election. In 1920 the Legislature enacted G. L. c. 41, § 21,* 2 Under § 21, a town is authorized to have its selectmen act as water commissioners. In 1984, the town pursuant to § 21 voted at a special town meeting to have its selectmen act as water…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Boston Teachers Union v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Del Duca v. Town Administrator of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Golden v. Board of Selectmen of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Warr v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  2. Police Department v. FedorchukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  3. Brooks v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API