Legal Opinion
Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 2, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 14669PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
This is a suit for treble damages and injunctive relief brought under Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15, 26. Defendants, Aluminum Company of America and Crown Central Petroleum Corporation, filed a motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, under Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing the action. No answer to the complaint has been filed by the defendants. Plaintiffs, Woods Exploration Company, Stanley C. Woods, and Southeastern Pipeline Company, then filed a motion to strike the defendants’ motions.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., Doing Business as Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Murray Israel, M.D. v. Baxter Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Jacobson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Olvera v. MichalosDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.