Legal Opinion
Murray Israel, M.D. v. Baxter Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 9, 1972No. 24622PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief based on an alleged conspiracy by defendants in violation of federal and state antitrust laws. Essentially, they assert that the defendants conspired to keep plaintiffs’ drug Cothyrobal off the interstate market and out of competition with Choloxin, a similar drug sold by defendants Baxter and Travenol, by influencing the Food and Drug Administration to deny fair consideration of the new drug applications filed by plaintiffs for Cothyrobal. The plaintiffs allege that defendants (who include an official of the FDA) carried out…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Forro Precision, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Metro Cable Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Catv of Rockford, Inc., an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.