Legal Opinion

Fishel v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leonard Scholnick, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding in which the petitioner owner of a building containing rent-stabilized apartments seeks in effect review of an order issued by the Conciliation and Appeals Board (Board) which directed the owner to offer the tenant a renewal lease on the same terms and conditions as the tenant’s previous leases. The proceeding is improperly labeled “declaratory judgment”. The facts are not in dispute.

Petitioner is a member of the Rent Stabilization Association. Emma Walker is a tenant in apartment No. 5F of a rent-stabilized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colton v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Fazio v. JoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Briar Hill Apartments, Inc. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Tann Realty Co. v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrisania II Associates v. HarveyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  2. 17th Holding LLC v. RiveraAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
  3. Mott v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Rosario v. Diagonal Realty, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dick v. StrachanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API