Legal Opinion

Rosario v. Diagonal Realty, LLC

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan A. Madden, J.

In these three consolidated actions for declaratory and injunctive relief, seven rent-stabilized tenants are seeking to resolve the identical issue as to whether their landlords are authorized to decline continued participation in the federal section 8 rent subsidy program.1

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment seeking a declaration that the defendant landlords are obligated to continue accepting their section 8 rent subsidies. Plaintiffs contend that under *683New York State’s rent stabilization laws they are entitled to renewal leases with section 8…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Salvati v. EimickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Sullivan v. Brevard AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosario v. Diagonal Realty, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Borger Management, Inc. v. SindramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re BurchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Licht v. MosesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2006
  5. Kosoglyadov v. 3130 Brighton Seventh, LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API