Legal Opinion

Occhipinti v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1965No. 43361PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

Mrs. Roy Occhipinti, appellant, obtained in the Circuit Court of Harrison County a judgment (based on a jury verdict) of $1,500, against Rheem Manufacturing-Company, Inc., appellee. Rheem does not complain, but Mrs. Occhipinti in this appeal contends that the verdict is so grossly inadequate as to evince bias, passion and prejudice by the jury; and that the trial court erred in granting defendant an instruction which prohibited the jury from considering the death of her unborn child as it affects her damages. We hold she is entitled to a new trial on the issue of damages. The question of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. RAINEY v. HornMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kelly v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Snow v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Vaughan v. BOLLISMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Smith v. BorelloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Jude McClendon v. Reynolds Electrical and EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. 66 Federal Credit Union v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Singleton v. RanzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API