Vaughan v. BOLLIS

Arvell Vaughan, the appellant, sued appellees, Mrs. Jaunita Ballard and C. F. Bollis, for personal injuries sustained when he was struck by Mrs. Ballard’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict for $300. The direct appeal by Vaughan presents the question of the inade-. quacy of the verdict; the cross-appeal by Bollis presents the question whether he was entitled to a directed verdict.

We state the facts on the question of liability most favorably to the appellant, for whom the jury found. Highway 15 runs north and south. The Blythe Creek road intersects the highway from the west but does not…