Legal Opinion
Smith v. Borello
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 22, 2002No. Misc. No. 13 Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
We respond in this Opinion to a question certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
In January, 2000, Stacey Smith and Diana Borello were involved in an automobile accident in Baltimore City. Smith was 19 weeks pregnant at the time, and, as a result of the accident, suffered a miscarriage and lost the baby. She sued Borello in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for negligence, but Ms. Borello, a New Jersey resident, removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland where, in due course, Ms. Smith and Frank Holliday, the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Carey v. LovettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Jones, Mabel S. v. Prince George CtyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Pak v. HoangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.