United States v. Russell W. Matthews
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
Matthews appeals his conviction of willfully and knowingly answering a question falsely before a grand jury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. He argues that the question was susceptible of two interpretations under one of which his answer was not proved to be false.
The grand jury was investigating whether money derived from racketeering activities had been invested in enterprises engaged in interstate commerce. Appellant was questioned about $260,000 in cash that he and one Rasmussen had brought from New York to California. Appellant testified that he had obtained the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Milford E. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Milford E. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- The United States of America v. H. Philip Cash, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Richard Finucan and Dee RoccaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. James M. CullitonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Victor Cowley and Michael St. ClairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Dudley BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Demond Jamal CamperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.