Legal Opinion

United States v. James M. Culliton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 2003No. 00-10599PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed August 22, 2002, and appearing at 300 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir.2002), is WITHDRAWN. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit.

OPINION

2Per curiam

James Culliton appeals his felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 for making false statements on a medical form submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”). Culliton bases his appeal on three legal theories: First, the FAA form is fundamentally ambiguous and therefore the district court should have dismissed the Government’s false statement indictment. Second, Culliton’s felony…

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by51 opinions

  1. Rhoades v. Avon Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Letantia Bussell, United States of America v. Letantia BussellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. County of Santa Clara v. Astra USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API