Legal Opinion
United States v. Demond Jamal Camper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-50442PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendant Demond Jamal Camper appeals from his conviction of making a false statement to the government, 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (2000), when he filled out a criminal history questionnaire as part of an airport security badge application. He argues that there was insufficient evidence that his answer was false. We affirm.
I
In July 2000, Demond Jamal Camper pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of carrying a loaded firearm in public without being the registered owner, in violation of California Penal Code §§ 12031(a)(1) & (a)(2)(F). In the factual basis portion of his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Arnetta WeatherspoonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Elijah Albert Boone, Dehlia E. Boone, Jerry Boone and Roger SwayzeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. MohsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Arctic Slope Native Ass'n, Ltd. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- United States v. StrohmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Qing Chang Jiang, AKA Frank JiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Robert Harra, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.