Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2011No. 2009-2193PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} At issue is appellant Dan C. Johnson’s application for R.C. 4123.57(B) scheduled-loss compensation for an alleged total loss of use of his right hand. In 2007, Johnson had a sudden onset of pain and coolness in his right ring and little fingers while working as a meat cutter for appellee, Kroger Company. The mechanics of the injury are not clear from the record, but all physicians agree that Johnson’s condition is occupationally related.

{¶ 2} A vascular specialist diagnosed an embolism in the right extremity, and in the months to follow, several unsuccessful attempts were made to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Lopez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Varney v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Casey v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Smith ex rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Tradesman Internatl. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Block v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API