Legal Opinion

Smith ex rel. Smith v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2012No. 11AP-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

French, Judge.

{¶ 1} Relator, George Smith, filed an original action that asks this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its order that denied relator’s request for scheduled loss-of-use awards for the loss of his vision and hearing and to order the commission to find that he is entitled to those awards.

{¶ 2} This matter was referred to a magistrate pursuant to Civ.R. 53(C) and Loc.R. 12(M) of the Tenth District Court of Appeals. The magistrate issued a decision, which includes findings of fact and conclusions of law and is appended to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Lewis v. Diamond Foundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Quarto Mining Co. v. ForemanOhio Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Walters v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API