Legal Opinion
Sharnay Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 11574PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
On September 19, 1951, the motion of' plaintiff for preliminary injunction was argued and submitted to the Court for decision. Now the Court, after examining the briefs and the whole record, makes the following
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiff, Sharnay Hosiery Mills, Inc.,, is a manufacturer of ladies’ hosiery.
2. Defendants are the owners of United1 States Letters Patent No. Des. 151,732 issued November 16, 1948 for a design for ladies’ hosiery, said patent being hereinafter referred to as the Bley Patent.
3. The within action seeking a declaratory judgment with respect to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- A. B. Farquhar Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1900
- Glen Raven Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Waterloov Gutter Protection System Co. v. Absolute Gutter Protection, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Nebel Knitting Co., Inc. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. S. H. Kress & Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1952
- Sanson Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Nebel Knitting Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1954