Legal Opinion

Waterloov Gutter Protection System Co. v. Absolute Gutter Protection, L.L.C.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 1999No. Civil Action 97-2554PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge.

This case began as a relatively straightforward patent infringement dispute between two rain gutter manufacturers. Plaintiff, Waterloov Gutter Protection Co., Inc. (“Waterloov”), manufactures and sells a patented device that directs rain water into a roof gutter while preventing leaves and other debris from falling into and clogging the gutter. It alleges that Defendant Charles Knight (“Knight”), through his company, Absolute Gutter Protection, L.L.C. (“Absolute”), makes and markets a gutter essentially identical to Waterloov’s.

The scope of the case broadened…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Boyle v. County Of Allegheny PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Managed Care LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  2. In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  3. Rickenbach v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  4. MacEdo v. Dello RussoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. United States v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API