Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Holland & Hart
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1992No. 91-577PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
Plaintiff, Robert P. Barrett, (Mr. Barrett) brought this action against the law firm of Holland & Hart alleging fraud, negligent misrepresentation and deceit by an attorney in violation of Section 37-61-406, MCA; violation of Rule 11, M.R.Civ.P.; and legal malpractice. The District Court for the First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, granted Holland & Hart’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, summary judgment. Mr. Barrett appeals. We affirm.
We restate the issues as follows:
1. Did the District Court properly grant Holland & Hart’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kitchen Krafters, Inc. v. Eastside BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Batten v. Watts Cycle and Marine, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
- Boylan v. Van DykeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- Barrett v. Asarco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cechovic v. Hardin & Associates, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Jackson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Estate of KindsfatherMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Taylor v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Watts v. Westland Farm Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.