Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Asarco, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1988No. 87-303PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson
ASARCO appeals a Lewis and Clark County District Court order denying ASARCO’s motion for a new trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
Robert P. Barrett (Barrett) was employed by ASARCO for fifteen years and five months. He held a managerial position as a shift foreman since 1973. On November 26, 1983, Barrett injured his back in a work related accident at ASARCO’s East Helena plant. ASARCO paid Barrett his full salary and reimbursed Barrett for medical expenses from the date of the injury until May 8, 1984, when Barrett’s employment was terminated.
ASARCO met with Barrett on May 8, 1984.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
- Flanigan v. Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
- Cooper v. RosstonMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Wolfe v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
- Sikorski v. OlinMontana Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barrett v. Asarco Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Massman v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1989
- Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Farris v. HutchinsonMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Barrett v. Holland & HartMontana Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.