Jamens v. Shelby Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1ConcurrenceBronson, J.
I concur in the result *475reached by the majority but believe my colleagues reach the right result for the wrong reasons in Part III.
This Court recently adopted a rule of law with regard to zoning which in essence states that where a property owner can point to an external state policy favoring his particular land use, then the municipality has the burden of proving the reasonableness of the exclusion. Bristow v Woodhaven, 35 Mich App 205 (1971) (mobile home parks); Simmons v Royal Oak, 38 Mich App 496 (1972) (multiple residential dwellings).
The doctrine of preferred use has its origins in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Simmons v. Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lyon Sand & Gravel Co. v. Township of OaklandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971