Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Jamens v. Shelby Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1972No. Docket 11309Published

1ConcurrenceBronson, J.

I concur in the result *475reached by the majority but believe my colleagues reach the right result for the wrong reasons in Part III.

This Court recently adopted a rule of law with regard to zoning which in essence states that where a property owner can point to an external state policy favoring his particular land use, then the municipality has the burden of proving the reasonableness of the exclusion. Bristow v Woodhaven, 35 Mich App 205 (1971) (mobile home parks); Simmons v Royal Oak, 38 Mich App 496 (1972) (multiple residential dwellings).

The doctrine of preferred use has its origins in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Simmons v. Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Lyon Sand & Gravel Co. v. Township of OaklandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API