Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Royal Oak

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1972No. Docket 10698PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

Plaintiffs Timothy T. Simmons and Arlene L. Simmons brought this action challenging the validity of defendant’s zoning ordinance which restricted plaintiffs’ lots to single-family dwellings. The trial judge sitting as trier of fact held the ordinance unconstitutional and permanently restrained the defendant from preventing the erection of a 13-unit multiple structure. Defendant appeals as of right.

Defendant contends that the finding of the trial court that single-family residential zoning of plaintiffs’ property is invalid as falling outside the statutory zoning powers was erroneous.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Girsh AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Alderton v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Tel-Craft Civic Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Palmer v. Township of SuperiorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Binkowski v. Shelby TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. George v. Harrison TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API