Legal Opinion

Beck v. City of Tillamook

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. LUBA 90-056; CA A67345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Tillamook’s allowance of a conditional use permit for a homeless shelter. The challenged decision was made after petitioners had appealed and LUBA had remanded an earlier decision by the city to allow the shelter. Neither party sought our review of LUBA’s decision in the first appeal. The city argues that some of petitioners’ present assignments of error relate to matters that LUBA decided adversely to petitioners in the first appeal and that they are barred by res judicata from raising these issues now.1 Petitioners respond that,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office Services Corp. of America v. CAS Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Fisher v. City of GreshamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Smith v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beck v. City of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Schatz v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Beck v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API