Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Texas Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 22, 1920No. 9450PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the district court dissolving a temporary injunction issued ex par-te against J. E. Gill and the Texas Tire & Rubber Company, restraining them from making certain alleged alterations in a building' owned by Mrs. Mayer, located on the corner of Third and Houston streets, city of Ft. Worth, which she had rented to said Gill and others in April, 1918. The lease contract provided, among other things, that—
“No alterations shall be made in said premises without the consent of the said lessor or hen agents.”
Plaintiff alleged that in violation of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Bigelow v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Kresge v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Cawker v. TrimmelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Thomas Furnace Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- King's Court Racquetball v. Dawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
- Durante v. Consumers Filling Station Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. Building Leasing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fair West Building Corp. v. Trice Floor Coverings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.