Legal Opinion

Durante v. Consumers Filling Station Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1953No. 2587, 2588 and 2589PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Harnsberger, Justice:

By direct appeal to this court, the plaintiff below seeks reversal of separate judgments of the district court in three actions wherein the parties are identical and the issues are more or less substantially the same, in that they all involve the right to possession of real estate.

On May 1, 1950, plaintiff — as owner and lessor of premises — brought his first action of forcible entry and detainer in the justice court to obtain possession of the property from the defendant who was in possession holding under a written lease for ten years from March 1, 1945, at a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. HaydenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bigelow v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Walker v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Voss v. RalstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Consumers Filling Station Co. v. DuranteWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Lamonica v. BosenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Spreeman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API