Legal Opinion
Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty Associates
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1984PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Cooke.
The question presented on this appeal is whether a tenant has the right to make substantial changes to the demised premises. Such a right may arise from statute or contract. When, however, the instrument governing the tenancy prohibits such alterations, the tenant may not proceed under either authority.
The individual respondents are the holders of a reversionary interest in property located in New Hyde Park which is under a long-term land lease that was originally executed by the predecessor in interest to respondent S.F.R. Realty Associates. Initially,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Muzak Corp. v. Hotel Taft Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- West, Weir & Bartel, Inc. v. Mary Carter Paint Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Corhill Corp. v. S. D. Plants, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- 151 West Associates v. Printsiples Fabric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Kuper v. IovenkoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc. v. Nomura Credit & Capital, Inc.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- Uribe v. MERCHS. BANK OF NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Namad v. Salomon Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.