Legal Opinion
Martin v. Seligman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
These are two actions consolidated for trial, one for patent infringement and unfair competition against the defendant, Seligman, and the other for patent infringement against the defendant, Sears Roebuck and Co. Defendants deny the allegations and allege invalidity of the patent.
Patent No. 2,014,904, for a Combined .Carrying Bag and Work Basket, was issued to plaintiff on September 17, 1935, .and plaintiff began to manufacture this article in 1938. After a modest beginning, sales steadily increased so that by 1944 he had sold 250,000 pieces, an average of about 40,000…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- General Time Instruments Corp. v. United States Time Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Squeezit Corp. v. Plastic Dispensers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Oxford Filing Supply Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957