Legal Opinion
Richmond's Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 21, 2006No. LD-2003-008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
On November 14,2003, the New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition to suspend the respondent, William M. Richmond, from the practice of law for two concurrent one-year periods. We referred the petition to a Judicial Referee {Bean, J.). Based upon the parties’ stipulation of facts and submitted briefs, the referee found by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules) 1.4(a), 1.8(a), 1.15(a)(1) & (c), 1.16(d), and 8.4(a) and recommended disbarment. We adopt the referee’s findings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richmond's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Coffey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- O'Meara's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Douglas' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richmond v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- New Hampshire Supreme Court Professional Conduct Committee v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006
- Appeal of StacySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2007