Legal Opinion
O'Meara's Case
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 15, 2003No. LD-2002-004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
On May 28, 2002, the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) filed a petition with this court requesting that the respondent, Timothy A. O’Meara, be publicly censured for violation of certain rules of professional conduct. We referred the petition to a Judicial Referee (Bean, J.) for a hearing. The referee found by clear and convincing evidence that the respondent violated New Hampshire Rules of Professional Conduct 3.1, 3.3(a)(1), 8.4(a) and 8.4(c) *158and recommended public censure. We agree with the referee’s recommendation.
The following facts were agreed upon by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welts' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Jones' CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Feld's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Morgan's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Bruzga's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richmond v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Richmond's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Coffey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Bosse’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- O'Meara's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.