Birmingham v. Kielczewski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the trial court disallowing the defendant’s bill of costs and approving the plaintiff’s bill of costs.1 *220This appeal involves consideration of General Statutes § 52-1932 and Practice Book § 342,3 both of which govern an offer of judgment by a defendant. The defendant’s sole claim is that the trial court erred when it disallowed his bill of costs despite the fact that he had filed an offer of judgment in excess of the jury’s verdict prior to the introduction of evidence at trial. See Practice Book § 342. We find error.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Steadwell v. Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Krawiec v. KraftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Fukelman v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by3 opinions
- Triangle Contractors, Inc. v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. Investors Capital Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Ferranti v. Commissioner of Transportation, No. 359429 (Oct. 11, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991