Legal Opinion

Triangle Contractors, Inc. v. Young

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 7, 1989No. 7638PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant Frank X. Lo Sacco’s “motion for judgment of costs.” This issue arises from a rather complex procedural scenario which bears description.

In 1982, the plaintiff, Triangle Contractors, Inc., successfully brought an action against Debra M. Young, Inc., to collect monies for services rendered on a construction project. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, but, to date, the plaintiff has been unsuccessful in satisfying that judgment.

In 1985, Triangle brought the present action against the defendants, Debra M.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Condon v. Pomroy-GraceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Krawiec v. KraftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. State v. CrabtreeConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  4. Bridgeport Gas Co. v. District 50, United Mine Workers of AmericaConnecticut Superior Court · 1959
  5. Birmingham v. KielczewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Keans v. BocciarelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Yeager v. AlvarezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  4. Chin v. Pozzi, No. Cv91-0318389 (Mar. 29, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Chin v. Pozzi, No. Cv91-0318389 (Mar. 29, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API