Ferranti v. Commissioner of Transportation, No. 359429 (Oct. 11, 1991)
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR COSTS" The plaintiff has filed with the undersigned state trial referee motion for approval of certain disputed items in their bill of costs. These items involve transcript fees and fees for expert witnesses. The defendant has objected to consideration of these items on the grounds that (1) because the subject matter of the motion arose post-judgment the undersigned lacks jurisdiction to consider the pending matter, (2) filing the pending motion with the trial referee…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Koizim v. KoizimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- City of Waterbury v. MacKenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Sorenson Transportation Co. v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.