Ramirez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
The plaintiff-appellant is the widow of the late Raul Ramirez and the beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by defendant-appellee, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company upon his life. Plaintiff brought an action seeking to recover the double-indemnity benefits provided for under the terms of the policy, which benefits had been refused by the Insurance Company. The district court, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, directed a verdict for the defendant. We will reverse.
On November 20, 1974, Raul Ramirez purchased a life insurance policy with double-indemnity provisions…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brasel & Sims Construction Co. v. Neuman Transit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- German American Insurance v. HymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Barnes v. FernandezWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Knights & Ladies of Security v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Carey v. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Baldwin v. DubeWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Herring v. Welltech, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.