Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1978No. 4895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

The plaintiff-appellant is the widow of the late Raul Ramirez and the beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by defendant-appellee, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company upon his life. Plaintiff brought an action seeking to recover the double-indemnity benefits provided for under the terms of the policy, which benefits had been refused by the Insurance Company. The district court, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, directed a verdict for the defendant. We will reverse.

On November 20, 1974, Raul Ramirez purchased a life insurance policy with double-indemnity provisions…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Brasel & Sims Construction Co. v. Neuman Transit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. German American Insurance v. HymanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Barnes v. FernandezWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Knights & Ladies of Security v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carey v. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Baldwin v. DubeWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Herring v. Welltech, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API