Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 2012No. CC C080070CR; CA A139500; SC S059499PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was charged by indictment with (among other things) assault in the first degree under ORS 163.185. At trial, the state proceeded solely under the theory that defendant had aided and abetted his codefendant’s initial assault on the victim. A jury found defendant guilty. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed defendant’s first-degree assault conviction and remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings on the lesser charges of second- and fourth-degree assault. State v. Burgess, 240 Or App 641, 251 P3d 765 (2011). We allowed the state’s petition for review to examine whether,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. EwingOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. CastrejonOregon Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NascimentoOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State v. RaygosaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API