State v. Hansen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Defendant was convicted of hindering prosecution, ORS 162.325, and challenges the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal because the state did not prove the allegations of the indictment. The indictment alleged that defendant prevented the apprehension of a known felon, when the statute requires the state to prove that defendant prevented anyone from performing an act which might aid in the apprehension of a known felon. Defendant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal because of the variance between the indictment and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
- State v. ScheirmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.