Legal Opinion

State v. Nascimento

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2016No. CC 09FE0092, CA A147290, SC S063197PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

BALMER, C. J.

The narrow but potentially far-reaching issue in this case is the scope of ORS 164.377(4), which makes it a crime to use, access, or attempt to access a computer or computer network “without authorization.” The state argues that, although defendant’s employer authorized her to use the computer terminal at issue here, defendant did so for a purpose not permitted by her employer and thus…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. DickersonOregon Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. Giron-CortezOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  2. State v. ShifflettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. AkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Evans v. NoothOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. AkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API