Legal Opinion
In re Priest
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 17, 1978No. Appeal No. 78-511PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) conditionally “reversing” the rejection of claims 11-16, 21 and 22 in appellant’s application serial No. 417,487, filed November 20, 1973, for “Polymer/Polyols and Process for Production Thereof.” The action taken by the board is modified.
Invention
The inventions in the claims before us are “fluid polymer/polyol” compositions which *34are convertible to polyurethane foams “having reduced scorch” or discoloration. The compositions are “free radical catalyst-catalyzed reaction produces]…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Robert E. Moore and Edward J. JanoskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Wolfgang B. Klemperer v. Nathan C. PriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Application of Arthur L. ReeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In re DollingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Donaldson Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- SkyHawke Technologies, LLC v. Deca International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Margolis v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979