HMN Financial, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
This appeal arises out of a tax-change notice issued by the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue to relators HMN Financial, Inc. and its affiliates. In the notice, relating to tax years 2002 through 2004, the Commissioner concluded that relators’ business structure — a “captive REIT” 1 — lacked “economic sub stance” and “business purpose.” Based upon this conclusion, the Commissioner disregarded relators’ eaptive-REIT structure and attributed a substantial amount of additional income to them, raising their corporate franchise tax for 2002 through 2004 by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hutchinson Technology, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Green Giant Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Chapman v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Transport Leasing Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Bond v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Associated Bank, N.A. v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Ashland Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- E. I. duPont de Nemours and Company & Subsidiaries, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Humana MarketPoint, Inc., Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025